Parties often want their day in court, and see litigation as a sword with which to slay an opponent.
To that end, some are reluctant to mediate because they do not want to be seen as ‘weak’. In contrast, negotiating with a set objective, choosing to meet your opponent and putting forward your arguments is a sign of strength.
Reluctant parties to mediation should capitalise by using the mediator’s skills to help them engage in the process.
There can be a tendency to use lawyers as a shield once they are instructed, which means that all direct lines of communication between the parties are severed. A common consequence of that is that all sense of proportion is lost and parties become entrenched in their positions.
To that end, some are reluctant to mediate because they do not want to be seen as ‘weak’. In contrast, negotiating with a set objective, choosing to meet your opponent and putting forward your arguments is a sign of strength.
Reluctant parties to mediation should capitalise by using the mediator’s skills to help them engage in the process.
There can be a tendency to use lawyers as a shield once they are instructed, which means that all direct lines of communication between the parties are severed. A common consequence of that is that all sense of proportion is lost and parties become entrenched in their positions.
Mediation gives the opportunity for parties to meet face-to-face, often without their lawyers present. The presence of the neutral mediator can change the dynamics and help facilitate a settlement.
Contact Us to discuss your specific requirements